Home

Evolution and Teeth

  • May. 4th, 2008 at 5:48 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
Head over to Seed Magazine's recent article by PZ Myers entitled Abstract Sculptures of Evolution. It is very cool to read, and it is about teeth!!

Jason

View blog reactions

Last Night's Obama Rally

  • May. 1st, 2008 at 12:31 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
I attended the Bloomington, IN, Barack Obama rally last night, and I absolutely loved it. I truly believe in this man for president, and I cannot wait until he is in office. Superdelegates are turning towards him and away from Clinton, even ones who were supportive of Bill Clinton when he was in the White House. I believe he will win the majority of democratic delegates in Indiana, and I truly hope that Indiana goes blue this November. Last night, the rally began with a speech by Baron Hill, congressman from Indiana, pledging his support for Obama and putting up some highlights. The speech by Barack was simply awesome and I love his plans. Some people, like one of my friends, cannot see how he plans to accomplish these things when Hillary appears to have a plan already. The gas plan, as I spoke of yesterday, is totally a gimmick of McCain and Clinton and will do nothing for Americans except for 30 cents a day for three months. Clinton may know numbers, but Obama does too. He showed that last night when he spouted of all kinds of figures in relation to basically everything he was saying. Obama knows what he is talking about, and I fully support him. His views on education, the war in Iraq, healthcare, and a vast myriad of others are awesome and compelling. It may be hard to effect change, but I am sure he will get the most done that he can. Clearly, he alone will not effect change. We are also a part, and that is how Barack Obama will get things done. Through the people, not politics.

Jason

View blog reactions

Gas Prices and Politics

  • Apr. 30th, 2008 at 10:39 AM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
If you live in Indiana, and possibly elsewhere, you have seen all of the campaign ads on tv for different democratic candidates just itching to get your vote for the Indiana primary on May 6th. The current ads have a common theme: gas prices. I know gas prices are high, but that is not my concern here...it is the solutions the politicians have come up with. Jim Schellinger (sp?) and Barack Obama do not agree with suspending the gas taxes and Jill Long Thompson and Hillary Clinton want to do that and use the windfall profits from the oil companies to pay for it. While that may be a nice solution for the short term, it does not do any thing for the future and doesn't do a damn thing for the environment. What we should be doing, is what Barack Obama wants to do, alternative energies. I realize this may be a shock to Hillary fans, but her plan will do absolutely not a damn thing for us. It is an insanely stupid idea. Solutions that actually make sense include, but are not limited to, carpooling, driving less, using other methods of transportation such as biking/skating or walking, and alternative fuels. I know E85 and ethanol has not proven itself, but eventually it might so we should look into it, but the real solution that we should look into are self-renewable electric cars and hydrogen cells. Furthermore, car companies need to release very fuel efficient cars on the order of over 100 miles per gallon, which they have, but are too greedy for money to release. We need to look toward the future, not the present, for a solution to gas prices. The only answer that is going to satisfy the question is: we need to use less oil and less gas by changing our technologies. Lessen our oil dependency!!!

Jason

View blog reactions

Four Stone Hearth #39

  • Apr. 23rd, 2008 at 12:00 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader

(http://bensart1.homestead.com/files/pocket_on_hearth.jpg)

Everybody welcome to the 39th edition of the exciting Four Stone Hearth. What has been amassed is a wonderful collection of anthropological news from across the blogosphere. I promise that it will be awesome.

Let's do this chronologically, today, so we will begin with a post from A Very Remote Period Indeed which discusses meat eating in Neanderthals. We have known that Neanderthals had a diet largely carnivorous for quite some time, but it is interesting to see that juveniles were eating similar diets as adults were. Check out the post for a more in depth analysis and a link to the original paper from the Journal of Human Evolution.


This next one is not actually a post, but my own submission. I never blogged on it, because I was going to host this and could include the short snipet that would have been the blog post. I am generally succinct. The Australian has a new article entitled Hobbit had been to dentist. I am sure you may have heard a bit about this in the last few days, and I think it is complete crap, but that is just me. This is the crux of the new book and the article:

University of Adelaide professor of biological anthropology and comparative anatomy Maciej Henneberg says in his new book, The Hobbit Trap, that a lower left molar had a filling, a claim that threatens to blow out of the water conjecture by the fossil's describers that the Hobbit is 18,000 years old.


Are you kidding me? Seriously, the Homo floresiensis remains of LB1 had an amalgam or filling in the left M1? Professor Henneberg has never proposed this in any peer-reviewed journal, and he is following the ideas of the endemic cretin paper that came out a few months ago which I blogged about. Both of these things preclude it from consideration as even a possibility. The cretin paper was bad and this theory is out of the water. CT scans, x-rays, and photographs clearly show that this is not the case.


Archaeoporn has a very nice post covering a Neolithic ritual site. It turns out that the site of Kfar Ha'Horesh may not have been a ritual site alone, but likely also was a site of habitation. The lithic assemblage and faunal remains suggest that both habitation and ritualism were present at the site, since they mirrored other Pre-Pottery Neolithic B sites. The lack of houses can also be explained through taphonomy, but there are building at the site. Only a small portion of the site has been excavated, so there is still potential for some really good finds from Kfar Ha'Horesh. I have always liked the Neolithic in the Levant, and there is a lot to be learned about domestication by looking at these kinds of sites! Go check it out.


Still in the Neolithic, but now in Britain, Archaeozoology has a post on the Archaeology of Wool. It is quite interesting, and describes how wool evolved over the many years of domestication and the various types available and used. Certainly check this out.


Tim Jones over at Remote Central has a long post covering the Newark Earthworks. I have never been there, but they are fascinating to see. The long review is hard to summarize, so go check it out in all of its wonder. I just love the Woodland and Mississippian earthworks of the New World. They can be so beautiful and are wonders of architecture, if it can be called that, as well as their ties to the natural and astronomical world. My research experience is in the Caborn-Welborn phase Late Mississippians, who did not create earthworks, but I did help on an excavation of a Woodland period palisade and plaza. That was pretty cool.


Focusing on the first millennium AD in Sweden, we turn to the father of the Four Stone Hearth blog carnival, Aardvarchaeology, and examine his post on Examining the field of Saint Olaf, which makes me think of A Series of Unfortunate Events but that is besides the point. Go check it out, because sacred fields are just cool all around as is paganism. Not my field of interest or expertise, but certainly an attention grabber. It even involves Vikings.


Turning to the Renaissance in Europe, we look to British Humanist Association Science Group for a look into why science evolved there but not much elsewhere. The answer turns out to be disease...communicable disease. A quick excerpt:

What they did was create a composite measure of the prevalence of nine pathogens that are detrimental to human reproductive fitness (leishmanias, trypanosomes, malaria, schistosomes, filariae, leprosy, dengue, typhus and tuberculosis). They then correlated this with a variety of measures of individualism in countries and regions around the world (including the Hofstede Index). For all of them, the correlation was highly significant, with around 50% of the variation in individualism explained by historical pathogen prevalence.

Basically, this means that groups of people banded together and excluded outsiders in areas where disease was prevalent leading to imitation and emulation of prestige members as well as greater trial-and-error and individual experimentation. Very cool.


This is an interesting I was completely unaware of: ExecutedToday.com For the date of April 14th, the Orthodox “Old Believer” priest Avvakum was burned at the stake in Pustozyorsk — part of Russia’s brutal crackdown on religious dissenters, in 1682. If you like religion stuff, and especially if you like fundamentalism-type stuff, check this out. I am not saying that Avvakum was a fundie, because he was not, but it kinds of shows a parallel to modern times as well as the Protestant Revolution of Martin Luther (who was totally wierd and in my mind psycho). Religion can be quite quixotic and explosive, and in this case, a change in observance created a watershed of issues. The execution for today's date can be found here, 1945: Albrecht Haushofer, German Resistance intellectual.


A modern analysis with implications for the past two million years is summarized at Professor Olsen @ Large. He discusses the debate between the general intelligence and social/cultural intelligence hypotheses as they pertain to human brain evolution. After the analysis was completed, it turned out that the findings support the cultural/social intelligence hypothesis and contradicts the general intelligence hypothesis. Pretty cool stuff, so check out the entire post!


Also modern, is this post from Christopher O'Brien at Northstate Science. It discusses the need for archaeologists from all types of positions to be involved in public education. I think it would also help tremendously in private education, but lets not get too crazy here. The post is based off of a talk he gave at a professional meeting, so go check it out to get all of the information. It is really more of an informative post, so it is hard to summarize succinctly. We need to combat Intelligent Design!!


I have grouped these last three posts together, because one, they all come from the same site, and two they are somewhat related. They all come from the blog Neuroanthropology which is a blog I was unaware of and certainly a cool field. First up, Real Beauty and Why Women Want. It is really quite interesting, and shows our own self image as very powerful, so give it a click. Next, Do Antidepressants supress identity? which is a nice alliteration. Long term studies of drugs have not really looked at the long term effects of drugs, so people out there who have been on drugs for a long time are different people, AND they DO NOT know it! Antidepressants are supressing ourselves. How sad. Last of all, Microtargeting or Macrotargeting? On Politics and Culture. The first few paragraphs are informative, but I do not think they are necessarily true:

As Kim Severson opens, “If there’s butter and white wine in your refrigerator and Fig Newtons in the cookie jar, you’re likely to vote for Hillary Clinton. Prefer olive oil, Bear Naked granola and a latte to go? You probably like Barack Obama, too. And if you’re leaning toward John McCain, it’s all about kicking back with a bourbon and a stuffed crust pizza while you watch the Democrats fight it out next week in Pennsylvania.”


Shocking, no? I support Barack Obama quite a bit, but I do not like granola. I do love olive oil and tea lattes though...so, am I just as sucked in as everyone else? Check it out! Political anthropology...that is just scary.

It has been great writing this all up and reading all of these posts. I hope you have had as much fun reading all of these as I did, and even better...it was posted at noon! How wonderfully perfect.

Jason, signing off.


View blog reactions

Four Stone Hearth update

  • Apr. 23rd, 2008 at 9:40 AM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader


(http://www.stoneonline.com.cn/img/article/fireplace1.jpg)

The Four Stone Hearth is in progress, so I would like to let you all know that it will be up this afternoon. I had some late submissions, so I am giving it a little more time for them to filter in! It shall be very good.

Jason


View blog reactions

The Next Four Stone Hearth is coming up!!

  • Apr. 19th, 2008 at 8:22 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader


(http://bensart1.homestead.com/files/pocket_on_hearth.jpg)


The next edition of the Four Stone Hearth is coming up this Wednesday, and it will be hosted right here at Hominin Dental Anthropology. I already have some stuff to be included, but send in all of your stuff to JacenSolo_1 AT yahoo DOT com, obviously removing the stuff in caps, and please include FSH or Four Stone Hearth in the subject so that I take notice to it. So...send away; I await your submissions.

Jason


View blog reactions

I am writing a book...holla!

  • Apr. 13th, 2008 at 1:17 AM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader


(http://friendlyatheist.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/atheism-motivation.jpg)

So, as the subject of this post states, I have decided to write a book. After it is written, I will see how it is and see if I want to have it published. It is aimed for people who are skeptical of Christianity, namely skeptical Christians, and is somewhat based on my experiences over the years of skepticism. Yea for me. I will be famous, damn it!! I am also looking at buying a house, so there is all kinds of stuff on the horizon for me. I hope all kinds of things work out.

Jason


View blog reactions

New Four Stone Hearth

  • Apr. 9th, 2008 at 9:58 AM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
The thirty eighth edition of the Four Stone Hearth is up over at A Very Remote Period Indeed so everyone go check it out. It is the early bird special edition. The next edition will be hosted by yours truly on April 23rd. So remember to send me your submissions ahead of time at JacenSolo_1 at yahoo dot com.

Also, yesterday, I did my duty for this month by voting for Barack Obama and others in the Indiana primaries by early in-person absentee voting. It was good times, and I am pretty excited. For those of you who may not know a lot about the candidates, check out the main home page of Barack Obama and these handy cheat sheets aka issue flyers that the Obama campaign had put up. The issue flyers contain lots of information that I was unaware of...so check them out!

Jason

View blog reactions

My weekend to come

  • Apr. 4th, 2008 at 8:47 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader


(http://www.trueswords.com/images/prod/c/TS-TCS59KSET_540.jpg)

I totally own those knives, and they rock my socks. But this post is about my weekend, not about my kitchen knives. This weekend is pretty much going to suck in terms of work. As some of you know, I was recently promoted to sous chef (link to Wikipedia) so I mostly work in the mornings. As I am going to the PPA's Annual Meeting in Columbus, OH on Tuesday and Wednesday, I have to be off, so I am working this Saturday, Sunday, and Monday. Normally, it would not be all that bad, but this weekend I work Saturday night, Sunday day, and Monday morning. So, in other words, I work and am off in 8 hour time blocks until Tuesday. I hate when that happens. It results in lack of sleep and loss of the day. Anyway, I am off to watch some tv and read a little.

Jason


View blog reactions

Clinton is in trouble

  • Apr. 2nd, 2008 at 5:18 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
So, we went to the Hillary Clinton rally/talk today, well we wanted to. The talk was scheduled to begin around 2 pm, so we got there around 1 pm and were seated around 2:10. We left the building at 3:45 without ever seeing Bill Clinton. Yeah...he was two hours behind schedule and was due to be there around 4:30, and I was not about to stay there until like 6 just to see Bill speak. I went there today simply because I wanted to see the former president. I am not going to vote for Hillary, nor was I ever going to, but I think due to his presentation today, there will also be a lot more people in Bloomington and Indiana that will no longer be voting for her! Yea for Obama! The coverage just come on the news we are watching, and they were also mentioning the same thing. Oh...bad campaigning!!!

Jason

View blog reactions

What killed the mammoths?

  • Apr. 1st, 2008 at 2:39 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader


The debate over this question has been going for many years and many things have been indicated: climate change at the end of the Pleistocene, too much hunting by humans, disease, and even an asteroid that hit the ice sheet near Canada. A paper came out today in PLoS Biology entitled Climate Change, Humans, and the Extinction of the Woolly Mammoth. I just downloaded the paper and have not read it yet, but instead of reading it and then giving you a description after fellow bloggers have already discussed it, I will just link you to them!! You can read about it at Anthropology.net , written by fellow anthropologist Kambiz Kamrani, and at Artificial Habitat. Enjoy and get the paper yourself!!

Jason

View blog reactions

Life in a Nutshell

  • Mar. 29th, 2008 at 2:05 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
It seems that Technorati is now updating my stuff, but I should have asked for help from them sooner, because now my authority has significantly dropped and I am no longer ranked kind of high. I realize that people are not reading me less, it just looks that way because people are not linking to me very much on the posts that Technorati knows about. But, as I post more stuff and people read it, I will look more popular to myself, which is basically what Technorati does anyway. It will also help when I host the Four Stone Hearth blog carnival in the middle of April! So...keep track of that stuff because FSH is awesome. It is also cool to see that not only are English speaking anthropology blogs linking to me, but Spanish ones too!! So, please: add me to your blog roll and leave me a comment with your blog and I will add you to mine! I would love to hear from you, because no one leaves comments here! That is part of why I do not update very much.

In other news, I was just visited by one of Barack Obama's volunteers who are out getting people to register for the primaries and seeking more volunteers. I graciously signed up, because 1.) I will vote for Obama and 2.) I am interested in helping out! I have never really been political or involved in any of this, but ScienceBlogs, fellow bloggers, and the like have helped to educate me and allows me to know what I stand for as well as other views. I also received the bumper stickers I ordered from Richard Dawkins' Foundation for Reason and Science. They are one for the RDF logo and an atheist "A" Out sticker like the one below. Very cool.



I am also downloading the beta version of Ubuntu 8.04 "Hardy Heron" that is bound to be interesting. We will see how that goes. Hopefully, it has a Live component so that I do not have to actually install it. I do not want to loose all of the stuff I have already installed!!

Jason

View blog reactions

Teaching Abstinence-Only Sex Education=Dumb

  • Mar. 29th, 2008 at 10:31 AM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
ResearchBlogging.org
I recently read a paper in the journal Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, which happens to have an entire free issue for those that are interested. (click on the link to go to the free issue) Anyway, it was about the sexual behaviors of adult American women, and it was very enlightening. The bottom line of the paper, which I totally agree with, is that abstinence-only sex education is not only a waste of time, but it is harmful to women in America! Go Dubya...another fabulous victory for you. With 36% of the women between 20 and 44 being single and 88.5% of them being sexually experienced, 69.5% of them being sexually active, and having sex an average of 7.3 months out of the year, it is clear that abstinence-only sex education pales in comparison to any other form of sex education and furthermore, can be detrimental to sexual and reproductive health. Why can't Bush and the Republicans see this? If you do not teach women of all ages how to protect themselves against unwanted pregnancies and STDs, especially when many people have more than one partner a year (21.9% of singles), you are simply setting them up for disaster. It is perfectly fine to teach abstinence, because I do not think that sex should be experienced lightly, but come on...there is nothing wrong with sex if precautions are taken! Above all, it is natural to reproduce, and all that is occurring with abstinence-only sex education is repression of sexual expression and hidden sex. Clearly, most women (and therefore men) are having sex despite this abstinence movement (if it can be called such). Drop this charade and move into reality. "Since the 1950s, about 90% of Americans have engaged in premarital sex" (Lindberg and Singh 2008:32). Women need sexual and reproductive health at all ages so do not think that your daughter or son or brother or sister is not having sex simply because they were taught abstinence. Are they protected?

Just a quick side note: I just checked Technorati, which fails to index and ping my posts, but I had a blog reaction from a Spanish blog about Neanderthals! How cool is that? It can be found here: Mundo Neandertal


Jason

Lindberg, L.D., Singh, S. (2008). Sexual Behavior of Single Adult American Women. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 40(1), 27-33. DOI: 10.1363/4002708

View blog reactions

More on Flores: news from Palau

  • Mar. 11th, 2008 at 1:45 AM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader


(http://www.dkimages.com/discover/previews/958/75015695.JPG)

You may have heard of the new remains published yesterday on PLoS One of small bodied humans from Palau. I saw this paper and immediately read it, and it turned out to be very good. I will not go into depth here, because for the most part, it has nothing to do with Flores and other bloggers have taken on that role. Check out the paper at PLoS One and two reviews so far that I know of at Anthropology.net and Pondering Pikaia. The paper is open access, so even if you only care a little, check it out. It will reveal some things about Flores, or rather, the environment they may have lived in and how these new remains fit into the paradigm. It is edited by John Hawks, even! It sheds lots of light on the position of the Flores remains.

Jason

EDIT (12:50PM): Afarensis has also written about it!

View blog reactions

Flores and endemic cretins

  • Mar. 10th, 2008 at 10:11 AM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
ResearchBlogging.org
So, I read the famous paper last night (or shall I say infamous) recently published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences asking the question if Homo floresiensis are really just myxoedematous endemic cretins. I will make this short and sweet, because the paper does not require a thorough review. It is an interesting idea, and certainly possible, but they take things quite out of proportion. You have probably read the reviews of people much quicker than me Kambiz, Greg Laden, and Afarensis, but I like to put my two cents in (or a nickel due to inflation).

We know modern humans colonized Indonesia and Australia by 50 ka, so Homo floresiensis caused quite a stir when discovered, which is likely the fuel behind showing that they are just a pathological specimen. That worked for LB1, for a while, but when the other remains were found things got more complicated. In strolls the endemic cretins idea. Here is the crux of my critique: I agree that cretins do indeed exist now in the area and probably did at a higher incidence in the past, but now we are going to mistake primitive traits and robust limbs as evidence for pathology and false robusticity? Sounds like a lot of crap to me. The environment is conducive to the condition, but so are a lot of places. They admit their idea is somewhat weak and will require more evidence to prove it, but they take some evidence that is both primitive and possibly pathological and then exploit it. Example: LB1 does not have a chin, as do a lot of Australomelanesians, but that is besides the point, which is primitive as hominins in general do not have chins. But they say, lack of a chin is consistent with cretinism, as it may be. But, does the lack of a chin suggest cretinism? Absolutely not. Let's move on. I only buy some of the craniofacial arguments, very little of the postcranial arguments, and possibly the sella turcica argument. The authors just work too hard to tie LB1 and LB6 into the cretin model. They attempt to show that Tocheri (2007) was incorrect, which I highly doubt. I saw that paper at the AAPA's last year and read the paper. I completely believe that the carpals of H. floresiensis are primitive not bipartite. They also suggest that cretins lived in caves as outcasts, did not bury their dead, and therefore preserved while the parent populations buried their dead so there are no remains. Furthermore, they tie in fairy tales in a last ditch attempt to prove themselves. Wow...I am amazed. How exactly did this last portion make it through the peer review process?

Out of all of this crap, the dental evidence is the strongest in terms of their theory, but even it does not hold up. They mention that "clearly" they determined from a screen capture of a television program showing an x-ray that a buccogingival ridge slopes to the buccal surface of the mesial root.

(image from Anthropology.net)
I fail to see anything of that sort on the image...sorry. Furthermore, the entire half page discussion on the dental evidence is based on this image and the incorrect identification of that tooth. They say it is a delta form deciduous lower first molar (dm1) and the rest of us say it is a lower third premolar (P3). Looking at a picture of the dentition of LB1, I would say it is a P3. I have seen lots of deciduous molars in the lab as well as third premolars, and the tooth resembles a premolar. I admit, my picture is not awesome but you would think that we would notice deciduous molars. So, in the end, this paper is an interesting idea, but the authors went too far in their arguments.

Jason


Obendorf, P.J., Oxnard, C.E., Kefford, B.J. (2008). Are the small human-like fossils found on Flores human endemic cretins?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, -1(-1), -1--1. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1488


Tocheri, M.W., Orr, C.M., Larson, S.G., Sutikna, T., Jatmiko, E.W., Saptomo, R.A., Due, T., Djubiantono, M.J., Morwood, W.L., Jungers, . (2007). The Primitive Wrist of Homo floresiensis and Its Implications for Hominin Evolution. Science, 317(5845), 1743-1745. DOI: 10.1126/science.1147143


View blog reactions
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
ResearchBlogging.org
If you are readers of Afarensis, you have already seen his short post on this paper before here, but I would like to give a more detailed overview. First off, let's say that the word hominin in the subject is used very loosely for Sahelanthropus tchadensis. I do not believe, based on Wolpoff et al. 2006, that Toumai is a hominin, but Australopithecus bahrelghazali certainly is. The paper is Open Access, which is awesome, because more research needs to be published that way. In this paper, the authors use a novel technique (to me) for determining the ages of the two specimens, and the bulk of the paper is a verification of the technique for the localities in Chad. The radiochronological method is based on the 10Be/9Be ratio and is very similar to 14C dating. At the localities, an ash tuff which is nearby is not present, so they could not do normal radio-dating with things like uranium, potassium, or argon. The stratigraphy is the same between the sites, but the tephra layer does not contain glass sherds large enough and without inclusions to allow standard radiometric methods. But, the beryllium method is really cool, and as I said before, works like carbon-14.

Instead of summarizing it, here is the method as presented in the paper:
Like 14C, 10Be is mainly produced in the atmosphere, but through spallation reactions on oxygen (O) and nitrogen (N) rather than via a (neutron, proton) reaction on 14N as is the case for 14C. The particle-reactive 10Be adsorbs on aerosols and is rapidly transferred to the surface of the Earth in soluble form by precipitation. If deposited in an aqueous environment, 10Be is ultimately removed from water on settling particles and deposited in marine and lacustrine sediments. If deposited in a continental setting, 10Be associates with continental particles, where it decays with a half-life of 1.4 million years. This opens up the possibility to date sedimentary deposits in the range of 0.2 to 14 Ma.

So basically, beryllium is created by cosmic rays (galactic and solar) that hit oxygen atoms and split them in half. Those particles then bind with aerosols and rain down onto the earth. Depending on the landscape, it ends up in the sediment by settling or combining with dirt (also loosely used). Also like carbon-14 and nitrogen-14, you cannot just measure the ratio between mother and daughter and arrive at a date like a lot of the other radiometric methods. The concentrations must first be calibrated and normalized for the specific area of interest, because 10Be/9Be ratios are not the same worldwide like 14C. To do that, sequential leaching procedures have been developed that result in a ratio of beryllium that matches the ratio of soluble beryllium at the depositional time.

As a side note,
C-14 has a universal initial 14C/12C ratio because it is rapidly oxidized to form gaseous 14CO2 and is then globally homogenized with the natural carbon isotopes during its 7 to 8 years residence time in the atmosphere...much like the atmospheric 14C/12C ratio, the initial authigenic 10Be/9Be ratio is sensitive to variations of the geomagnetic field intensity and the solar activity that effect 14C and 10Be production in a similar fashion.

So, after you know the levels at the locality you are working at, simply apply the standard exponential decay formula with the known constants and you arrive at an age! [N(t)=N0e-λt where N0 is the initial authigenic ratio, N(t) is the present level, and λ is the reevaluated 10Be halflife of (1.36±0.07) x 106 years] The dates they arrive at are "remarkably consistent" with the mammal faunal age estimations. So.....(long pause for effect).....the method works beautifully as long as the ratio of beryllium is known and it is a closed system.

So, what are the dates? The Sahelanthropus tchadensis Toumai cranium comes out at 7.04±0.18 Ma and the Australopithecus bahrelghazali specimen comes out at 3.58±0.27 Ma. The date for the latter specimen indicates that Australopithecus bahrelghazali and Australopithecus afarensis were contemporaneous, especially in the case of Lucy (≈3.18±0.01 Ma) and could possibly be used to eliminate the need for a separate species. But, for all of the good this paper has had so far, the last paragraph is horrendous. Afarensis agrees with that statement, I am sure! Here it is:
The radiochronological data concerning Sahelanthropus tchadensis (Toumai, TM 266) reported here is an important cornerstone both for establishing the earliest stages of hominid evolution and for new calibrations of the molecular clock. Thus, Sahelanthropus tchadensis testifies that the last divergence between chimps and humans is certainly not much more recent
than 8 Ma, which is congruent with Chororapithecus abyssinicus, the new 10-Ma-old Ethiopian paleogorillid. With its mosaic of plesiomorphic and apomorphic characters Sahelanthropus tchadensis, the earliest known hominid, is probably very close in time to this divergence contrary to the unlikely "provocative explanation," which recently suggested a "possible hybridization in the human-chimp lineage before finally separating less than 6.3 Ma".

I agree that this paper and the Sahelanthropus tchadensis specimen are important for those reasons, but not for the same reason they believe so. I believe Sahelanthropus tchadensis is close to the divergence of chimps and hominins but on the other side, which also goes well with the recently published Chororapithecus abyssinicus. Here is the huge thing, they dismiss the "provocative explanation" and never say why or give any reasons!! This is not science but politics! I have not read the paper, but hybridization is certainly possible and certainly not provocative!


Jason


Wolpoff MH, Hawks J, Senut B, Pickford M, and Ahern J. 2006. An Ape or the Ape: Is Toumai Cranium TM 266 a Hominid? PaleoAnthropology 2006:36-50.

Lebatard, A., Bourles, D.L., Duringer, P., Jolivet, M., Braucher, R., Carcaillet, J., Schuster, M., Arnaud, N., Monie, P., Lihoreau, F., Likius, A., Mackaye, H.T., Vignaud, P., Brunet, M. (2008). Cosmogenic nuclide dating of Sahelanthropus tchadensis and Australopithecus bahrelghazali: Mio-Pliocene hominids from Chad. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0708015105

View blog reactions

Four Stone Hearth!

  • Feb. 28th, 2008 at 4:01 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
The latest Four Stone Hearth is up over at Archaeoporn which is a very nice blog all together. Go check it out!!

Jason

View blog reactions

A Portait of Atheism

  • Feb. 25th, 2008 at 2:35 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
Last night, I read Sam Harris' book, Letter to a Christian Nation which I very much enjoyed. The book is written like a letter from an atheist to a Christian person, and I love the style. The book therefore, does not shy away from bold statements and veritable solutions. To some, it may be somewhat offensive, but I think it is exactly what is needed. A book that states just what Christians say and the response atheists have. In less than one hundred pages, he portrays the biggest Christian arguments with their demise and utter refusal. I absolutely loved the book, and my girlfriend is going to read it next (she is a Christian).

Currently, I just started watching The Four Horsemen available at RichardDawkins.net aka the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science. So far, it is very good, and I suggest it to all. It really shows what atheists are like. We are not the evil people many think we are. In fact, we really care. I particularly like the discussion, in the beginning, about offending people. Many religious people are offended when we even say the slightest thing against their beliefs. Really, this is stupid. Think of it this way, which is the way spoken of in the movie, physicists are not offended when their ideas are disproved or challenged. Furthermore, we can say we do not like peoples' clothes, hair, choice of food, etc and they will not be offended. If they are offended, it will not even approximate the level of offense that occurs when we challenge their religious views. They also mention that we could also claim offense, if they decide to do so. Basically, we as atheists cannot say anything without it being rude, and it is bullshit. We can be damned to Hell by Christians, but we cannot say anything even remotely anti-Judeo-Christian. And, it is not as if we hate religion right out. There are some good aesthetic things with religion, and those we are okay with. We just choose to take indifference to some of the things in religion. So, why can we not criticize it? Just some food for thought.

Jason

View blog reactions

Volcanoes and Dmanisi

  • Feb. 14th, 2008 at 3:12 AM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
ResearchBlogging.org
Like all things, I am always late on reporting stuff on the blog, but really, it is because I am busy. I am working on my graduate application now, so it is even more tight. Huge backlog on papers does not go down easy!! Anyway, I just read the recently published paper in Comptes Rendus Palevol Impact probable du volcanisme sur le deces des Hominides de Dmanissi. I actually received the paper from the blogger of A Very Remote Period Indeed, so many thanks go to her. Yes, the paper is in French (and the article is still in press), but it has an abridged English version. There is quite a bit of geology stuff that is beyond me, but the key points are that the bones found at the Dmanisi site were not transported by runoff or carnivores, have no cutmarks or tooth marks indicative of hominins or carnivores, are not a primary accumulation after natural death, are not a secondary anthropic accumulation, and did not succumb to quicksand. I do not know why quicksand comes to mind here, but apparently it does. The bones are also remarkably preserved. Anyway, after looking at the soil and tephras around and near the bones, the soils came from a volcano about 20 km away and are the result of cold ash accumulation. The remains date to 1.81 Ma, which is quite a time depth for dispersal from Africa, but you have to love Dmanisi for shaking things up with the paradigm.

So, what happened to the Dmanisi individuals? Basically, they died of asphyxiation. How much does that suck? Of course, there is really no way of actually testing this, but it makes a lot of sense having looked at the paper. The remains are scattered over 200 m2 in a natural depression. There are five skulls, four mandible, and a bunch of other bones from people ranging from 14 to elderly. And they are all in the same stratigraphic layer. So yes...not natural and catastrophic death in terms of mortality profiles. How they would have asphyxiated is actually kind of cool. The hominins were likely surprised by the volcanic ashfalls, and retreated to a natural depression in search of protection. The ash was cold, so not immediately mortal, but when breathed in it mixes with naso-bucco-pharyngeal secretions like mucous and saliva. As the mixture accumulates the hominins and other animals have obstructions of the digestive and respiratory tracts, so they suffocate...slowly. Now that sucks.

On a much lighter note, the 34th Four Stone Hearth is up over at Our Cultural World, so go check it out. I was disappointed I was not in it...but I did not send anything in. I will have to do something for the next one.

Jason

DELUMLEY, M. (2008). Impact probable du volcanisme sur le deces des Hominides de Dmanissi. Comptes Rendus Palevol DOI: 10.1016/j.crpv.2007.09.002

View blog reactions

The Anti-Crust am I

  • Feb. 13th, 2008 at 1:36 PM
red hair, Palpatine, anticrust, Jason, tank girl, Dilbert, McDonald's, Israel, Sahelanthropus tchadensis, short jedi, Ardipithecus kadabba, Darth Vader
Last night, I finished the last book in the Lindsay Chamberlain mystery series, Airtight Case, which I mentioned earlier. It was really good. Beverly Conner is sort of like Garrison Keillor, in that she mentions all kinds of things throughout the book and then ties up all of it at the end. Very cool. I totally recommend them. Today I am going to the lab, reading some papers, and such. If anything is cool therein, I will let you know.

Jason

View blog reactions